All 62,187,024 births in the United States from 2000 to 2014.
The data are just two columns, a date and a count.
| date | births |
|---|
The same 5,479 daily counts, without regard to date.
Daily births decomposed into four sources of variation.
Births rose during the economic expansion of the mid 2000s and fell during and after the Great Recession (2007 to 2009).
Each line represents one year. Births peak in September, approximately 38 weeks after the winter holidays…
Each line represents one year. Births are most frequent on Tuesday and least frequent on Sunday.
Effect of each calendar date on weekday births after adjustment for day of week and season.
Points are averages of daily births, in percent, after removing the other components, by month for the trend, by calendar date for season and day of year, and by weekday and year for day of week.
Births on each calendar date relative to the mean daily births of the same year. The Day of year panel shows the same dates after adjustment for day of week and season.
Daily birth counts for 5,479 consecutive days, January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2014.
| Date | Day | Births | Model expected | vs year mean |
|---|
There are only 14 distinct calendars, one for each day of the week a year can start on, in common and leap years. From 1901 to 2099, where every fourth year is a leap year, they repeat in the same order every 28 years. In each cycle the common year calendars are used three times each and the leap year calendars once each, and every date falls on each day of the week exactly four times. The pattern breaks at century years, which are leap years only when divisible by 400, so 1900 and 2100 have no February 29 while 2000 does. The 15 years from 2000 to 2014 cover only part of a cycle and use 11 of the 14 calendars, so dates other than February 29 fell on a weekend unequal numbers of times (3, 4 or 5). Since fewer births occur on weekends, each extra weekend lowers a date's average by about 2%, so raw counts by date depend partly on the arbitrary start and end of the series rather than on the date itself. This is one reason a model is needed. It separates the effect of a date from the day of the week it happened to fall on.
All components are estimated together, in a simplified version of the model in BDA3 section 21.2.
Observed births minus the model's expected births, as a percentage of expected, for each of the 5,479 days.
Each date compared with the model, and its rank among all 5,479 days by absolute size of residual.
| Date | Day | vs model | Rank |
|---|
Births above or below the model on each day.