The probability density of the univariate standard Gaussian (also called the standard normal) is
If Z \sim \mathcal{N}(0, 1), then X = \mu + \sigma Z \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2), so every Gaussian is a shifted and scaled standard Gaussian.
For a continuous random variable, probability is area under the density, P(a < X < b) = \int_a^b f(x)\,dx.
The z-score of a value x is z = (x - \mu)/\sigma, the number of standard deviations x lies above or below the mean. If X \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2), then (X - \mu)/\sigma \sim \mathcal{N}(0, 1). The heights below are of US women and men, each group modeled as a Gaussian.
The kernel e^{-x^2/2} has no closed form antiderivative, so the area A under it can't be found directly. The two dimensional Gaussian looks harder but is actually easier to work with, and A can be recovered from its volume. The π in the normalizing constant emerges because the 2D Gaussian is constructed from circles.
Each dot is one draw from the standard Gaussian in one, two or three dimensions. Below each plot is the distribution of a draw's distance from the center.
Round means rotationally invariant, which happens exactly when f depends only on x^2 + y^2. Square means X and Y are independent with the same distribution, f(x, y) = g(x)\,g(y).
Add up independentWe can even relax this assumption and allow for weak dependence, like rainy days that come in streaks. The sum still ends up close to normal, though with a different standard deviation than independence would give., identically distributedWe can even relax this assumption and allow the X_i to have different distributions, as long as no single one dominates the sum. random variables X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n and you get a new random variable S_n with its own distribution. What happens to its shape as n grows? Does it depend on the distribution of the components?
The empirical distribution of daily rainfall at Sea-Tac Airport, 1948 to 2025. Most days have no rain and the rest have a continuous amount, so rainfall is neither discrete nor continuous. The rows add independent draws from this distribution, which assumes the days are independentIs that reasonable? What changes if it is not?.